eLegalix - Allahabad High Court Judgment Information System (Judgment/Order in Text Format)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 10
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2168 of 2011
Petitioner :- Rama Krishna Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd.
Respondent :- Sri V.N. Garg, Principal Sec. Industrial Dept Lko. And Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Anil Kumar Srivastava,M.D. Singh Shekhar,R.D. Tiwari
Hon'ble Sanjay Misra,J.
According to Sri M.D.Singh 'Shekhar', learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri R.D.Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, the applicant had filed Writ Petition No. 51304 of 2006 (Rama Krishna Sahkari Avas Samiti Ltd. Malakpur/Surajpur, Laxmi Place, District Gautam Buddh Nagar Vs. State of U.P. and another), wherein by the order dated 24.2.2009, a Division Bench of this Court required the respondent no.2, who according to learned counsel for the applicant was the Greater Noida Audyogik Vikas Pradhikaran through its Mukhya Karyapalak Adhikari/Chairman, H-169, Chitwan Estate, Sector-Gama, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar to refer the matter to the State Government to examine whether any Cooperative Housing Society, which was similarly circumstanced has been allotted the developed land by the opposite party no.2 out of the total land acquired from the Cooperative Housing Society after the policy underwent a change. It was further directed that upon the reference being made, the State Government shall consider the matter after hearing the concerned parties and decide within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. Learned counsel states that certified copy of the order was served on the opposite party no.2 on6.8.2009 and although the period of three months has expired, the opposite party no.2 has not referred the matter to the State Government nor the State Government has been able to consider the claim of the applicant, which is disobedience of the directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court. The cause of action is alleged to have arisen on 06.04.2011 when on personal hearing the opposite parties refused to comply with the order.
Prima facie it appears that the opposite parties no. 2 and 3, Sri Mohinder Singh, Chairman, Greater NOIDA, Gautam Budh Nagar and Sri Rama Raman, Chief Executive Officer, Greater NOIDA, Gautam Budh Nagar have disobeyed the order dated 24.2.2009 passed by the Division Bench of this Court.
In view of the aforesaid circumstances, issue notice to opposite parties no. 2 and 3, Sri Mohinder Singh, Chairman, Greater NOIDA, Gautam Budh Nagar and Sri Rama Raman, Chief Executive Officer, Greater NOIDA, Gautam Budh Nagar fixing an early date. The opposite parties no. 2 and 3 are required to file reply to the contempt petition by the next date fixed, failing which they will be required to appear in person on that date to answer the contempt petition.
List the contempt petition on the date so fixed.
Order Date :- 27.4.2011/Lbm/-
|
?Court No. - 10
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2168 of 2011
Petitioner :- Rama Krishna Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd.
Respondent :- Sri V.N. Garg, Principal Sec. Industrial Dept Lko. And Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Anil Kumar Srivastava,M.D. Singh Shekhar,R.D. Tiwari
Hon'ble Sanjay Misra,J.
According to Sri M.D.Singh 'Shekhar', learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri R.D.Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, the applicant had filed Writ Petition No. 51304 of 2006 (Rama Krishna Sahkari Avas Samiti Ltd. Malakpur/Surajpur, Laxmi Place, District Gautam Buddh Nagar Vs. State of U.P. and another), wherein by the order dated 24.2.2009, a Division Bench of this Court required the respondent no.2, who according to learned counsel for the applicant was the Greater Noida Audyogik Vikas Pradhikaran through its Mukhya Karyapalak Adhikari/Chairman, H-169, Chitwan Estate, Sector-Gama, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar to refer the matter to the State Government to examine whether any Cooperative Housing Society, which was similarly circumstanced has been allotted the developed land by the opposite party no.2 out of the total land acquired from the Cooperative Housing Society after the policy underwent a change. It was further directed that upon the reference being made, the State Government shall consider the matter after hearing the concerned parties and decide within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. Learned counsel states that certified copy of the order was served on the opposite party no.2 on6.8.2009 and although the period of three months has expired, the opposite party no.2 has not referred the matter to the State Government nor the State Government has been able to consider the claim of the applicant, which is disobedience of the directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court. The cause of action is alleged to have arisen on 06.04.2011 when on personal hearing the opposite parties refused to comply with the order.
Prima facie it appears that the opposite parties no. 2 and 3, Sri Mohinder Singh, Chairman, Greater NOIDA, Gautam Budh Nagar and Sri Rama Raman, Chief Executive Officer, Greater NOIDA, Gautam Budh Nagar have disobeyed the order dated 24.2.2009 passed by the Division Bench of this Court.
In view of the aforesaid circumstances, issue notice to opposite parties no. 2 and 3, Sri Mohinder Singh, Chairman, Greater NOIDA, Gautam Budh Nagar and Sri Rama Raman, Chief Executive Officer, Greater NOIDA, Gautam Budh Nagar fixing an early date. The opposite parties no. 2 and 3 are required to file reply to the contempt petition by the next date fixed, failing which they will be required to appear in person on that date to answer the contempt petition.
List the contempt petition on the date so fixed.
Order Date :- 27.4.2011/Lbm/-
HELLO ALL, WHAT IS THE CURRENT STATUS OF THIS SOCIETY........????????
ReplyDeleteHi please anybody has any information on this society please get in touch with me on 9823991983
DeleteKindly provide the current status of the society and phone number and address if anybody has
ReplyDeleteplease share present status of this society or any link for the same.
ReplyDeleteI have recently started follow up with the officials of society. It looks like our case is already diluted in court and now only money rewarded as compensation for acquired land will be paid. pls email me on jayendra73@gmail.com to connect
ReplyDelete